Let's cut our colleagues some slack
Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:32AM 
It has become very fashionable to write blog posts that are critiques of the way some company has mis-managed a social media crisis. The general premise of these posts is that the social media manager/team has mismanaged things and that if they only had the insight of this particular social media "guru" then things would have worked out perfectly. I'm a little tired of it, and here's why.
There's something missing from these critiques. Reality.
Most of the time I read these posts I have to think that the person writing has never actually been involved in social media in the real world. If they had then they would know that reality isn't the perfect world they've constructed in their review. Things get in the way of even the most perfect plans. Things like budgets, time constraints, overzealous legal teams and more. Yet to make a "good" review none of these things are considered and it's often assumed that the community manager (or social media director or whoever manages social for the company) has made mistakes in their handling of the situation.
The problem is that even if the social media manager has a perfect plan in place and is ideally situated to respond to whatever crisis may arise, there are always other factors. Perhaps there are posts on your Facebook wall that really should be responded to immediately. But what if the situation is still developing and the CEO has ordered that nothing goes out to the public without her approval? Maybe there's 25 new blog posts about the crisis. Obviously the manager should be monitoring and responding as appropriate. But what if the social media manager is also responsible for talking to the media and is completely occupied with that?
In an ideal world each company would have a huge team of social media and community managers with an unlimited budget and an executive team that totally gets "it." Unfortunately, that's not the case. Yet how often do we see someone pointing out each little flaw in a response as if the person running things was a complete idiot?
Here's what I propose. Stop assuming that everyone is an idiot. Start giving people the benefit of the doubt. In the real world you don't always have time to plan things a week in advance. In the real world there's not always the budget the social media manager would like. In the real world the person (yup, often just one person) tasked with monitoring may be stuck in meetings for a couple of hours while tweets are flying about them.
Even huge companies with entire social media teams have their limitations. The point is the person writing the critique has no idea what's going on behind the scenes.
Yes, I understand that we can learn things from evaluating what others have done. I don't think we have to stop learning and critiquing. Let's just do the community a favor and give people the benefit of the doubt sometimes while we're looking at their response. No, it may not generate the same link bait headlines we're used to but it might lead to a more valuable discussion in the end.
(No, I've never had one of these critiques written about me that I know of. However, I have been involved in crisis management response for an incident that made international headlines and I know first-hand that the text book response isn't always possible.)
What do you think? Am I off base? Do these people deserve to get slammed for their crisis handling?
Community,
Community Management,
Social Media 